[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
:: Volume 26, Issue 1 (Spring 2008) ::
J Dent Sch GYEAR__, 26(1): 47-52 Back to browse issues page
Comparison of different reinforcement methods of weakened buccal walls in premolar teeth
Nasrin Sarabi Dr., Hooriyeh Mousavi Corresponding Author: Dr. *1, Mohammad Alavi Dr., Ahmad Mazinani Dr.
1- , dentist_57@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (8754 Views)

Background and Aim: In order to improve the aesthetics and functional quality of restorations, the combined amalgam-composite restorations have been introduced. The aim of this study was to compare different reinforcement methods, in weakened buccal walls of premolar teeth.

Materials & Methods: In this in vitro study, 70 similar and intact premolar teeth were used. The specimens were divided into seven groups of ten. In six groups, the three reinforcing materials composite (A), Compoglass F (B) and glass ionomer (C) with two methods: I: buccal and distal wall reinforcement. II: buccal, distal and pulpal floor reinforcement was used. In the seventh group (D), the Scotchbond M.P.P adhesive as a control group was applied. Then specimens were restored conventionally with amalgam and submitted to 500 thermal cycles (5°C-55°C). The specimens were loaded through Instron testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min with angle of 45 degree. Statistical analyzes of ANOVA, Duncan and chi- square tests were used to analyse fracture strength, location and type of fracture.

Results: The highest strength was detected in group with composite reinforcement on buccal and distal walls and pulpal floor. The highest failure mode was adhesion type and observed in composite reinforcement and control group. The highest cohesive and mixed failure mode was respectively observed in Compoglass and glass ionomer groups.

Conclusion: This study showed that composite resin was the best material for reinforcement of weakened walls with favourable aesthetic property.

J Dent Sch 2008 26(1): 8

Keywords: Amalgam, Composite, Combined restorations
Full-Text [PDF 203 kb]   (1246 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Article | Subject: Special
Received: 2006/09/6
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML     Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Sarabi N, Mousavi H, Alavi M, Mazinani A. Comparison of different reinforcement methods of weakened buccal walls in premolar teeth. J Dent Sch. 2008; 26 (1) :47-52
URL: http://jds.sbmu.ac.ir/article-1-290-en.html


Volume 26, Issue 1 (Spring 2008) Back to browse issues page
مجله دانشکده دندانپزشکی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی شهید بهشتی Shahid Beheshti University Dental Journal
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.06 seconds with 32 queries by YEKTAWEB 3961