[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
:: Volume 37, Issue 1 (winter 2019 2019) ::
J Dent Sch GYEAR__, 37(1): 6-10 Back to browse issues page
Comparison of academic and nonacademic surgeons in treatment planning for CIII borderline case
Hoori Mirmohammadsadeghi * 1, Amir Bayatian2 , Fatemeh Allahyaric3, Mahmood Dashti4
1- Assistant Prof., Dept. of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Dental Research Center, Researchg Institute of Dental Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. , dashti.mahmood72@gmail.com
2- Postgraduate Student, Dept. of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
3- Postgraduate Student, Dept. of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
4- Private Practice, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract:   (174 Views)
Objectives In borderline class III malocclusions, the patients can be successfully treated by the orthodontic or surgical modalities, however; there is no consensus about the method with the best results regarding functional and esthetic parameters. The present study aimed to assess the treatment plans provided by academic and non-academic surgeons regarding borderline class III patients.
Methods In this cross-sectional descriptive study, diagnostic records of 20 borderline class III patients were assessed by 8 academic and 8 non-academic surgeons. The treatment plans suggested by the surgeons for patients were compared with the standard treatment plan based on case presentation. The data were analyzed by paired t-test, Wilcoxon test, Kappa coefficient, independent t-test and Chi-square test.
Results No significant differences were found between academic and non-academic orthodontists when suggesting orthodontic treatment (p=0.54), orthognathic surgery (p=0.1), single or double jaw orthognathic surgery (p=0.68) and the treatment plans in total (p=0.78) when compared with the standard treatment plan. The mean rate of agreement between the standard treatment plan and the academic and non-academic surgeons’ treatment plan for borderline class III patients was 75.0%±17.41% and 80.0%±17.73% for the orthodontic treatment plan, 80.0%±7.56% and 80.0%±17.73% for the surgical treatment plan, 70.55%±9.4% and 68.61%±9.08% for single or double jaw orthognathic surgery treatment plan, and 79.83%±7.76% and 80.63%±9.79% for the treatment plans in total, respectively.
Conclusion Academic and non-academic surgeons both showed higher agreements with the standard treatment plan when suggesting orthodontic and orthognathic surgery treatment plans for borderline class III patients.
Keywords: Treatment Protocol, Angle Class III, Surgeons
Full-Text [PDF 421 kb]   (36 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Article | Subject: Special
Received: 2019/10/7 | Accepted: 2019/10/7 | Published: 2019/10/7
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML     Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Mirmohammadsadeghi H, Bayatian A, Allahyaric F, Dashti M. Comparison of academic and nonacademic surgeons in treatment planning for CIII borderline case. J Dent Sch. 2019; 37 (1) :6-10
URL: http://jds.sbmu.ac.ir/article-1-1756-en.html


Volume 37, Issue 1 (winter 2019 2019) Back to browse issues page
مجله دانشکده دندانپزشکی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی شهید بهشتی Shahid Beheshti University Dental Journal
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.08 seconds with 32 queries by YEKTAWEB 3991