[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
:: Volume 30, Issue 3 (Fall 2012) ::
J Dent Sch GYEAR__, 30(3): 1-1 Back to browse issues page
Massoud Seifi Dr. *
Professor Dept. of Orthodontics , mseifi@gmail.com
Abstract:   (2006 Views)

  “Hypothesis”: The infrastructure of a research project

  In general, proposing a hypothesis is the first step towards resolving a problem. In order for a hypothesis to be a scientific hypothesis, it requires that one can test it with a scientific method. To achieve this goal, research centers and dental schools have the responsibility to provide a suitable environment to optimize the potential of researchers in conduction and dissemination of scientific knowledge. In other words, hypotheses should be practical and operable not only on paper but also in practice. Clearly, the outcome of a research project should aim at scientific advancements and generation of science and wealth and its intellectual property should be recorded as a national treasure. Therefore, we emphasize that setting a goal for only quantitative growth of article publication that is currently inconspicuous in the strategic plan of research centers is of no avail.

  In conduction of research projects, it is especially important to focus on the priorities. However, the priorities are not always in agreement with the “researchers” field of interest” or “scientific nature of projects”. Expertise, experience and knowledge of the research project manager as well as available equipment and technology in research centers play a determining role in this respect. Requests, needs and encouragements for implementation of research projects are confronted by “limitations”. The first limitation may be the “budget”. Since the budget allocated to each center for conduction of research projects is strictly limited, multicenter projects usually have a better chance of being accepted and implemented. Another limitation is the dependence of most projects to graduate and postgraduate doctoral or PhD theses. Duration of study in the mentioned fields is relatively short and students usually start their thesis projects at the end of their academic education. Besides the time issue, physical attendance of students and residents in classes is another obstacle against the conduction of research projects since classes, laboratories and research centers usually share the same closing hours.

  In the end, considering the limited financial and human resources and in other words the high “cost” of research projects, we hope that the proposed hypotheses which are the start point of projects measure up in terms of scientific value, priority and being highly cost-effective (both economically and intellectually).

Full-Text [PDF 8 kb]   (524 Downloads)    
Subject: Special
Received: 2013/09/21 | Accepted: 2013/09/21 | Published: 2013/09/21
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

Write the security code in the box >

XML     Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Seifi M. Editorial. J Dent Sch. 2012; 30 (3) :1-1
URL: http://jds.sbmu.ac.ir/article-1-1157-en.html

Volume 30, Issue 3 (Fall 2012) Back to browse issues page
مجله دانشکده دندانپزشکی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی شهید بهشتی Shahid Beheshti University Dental Journal
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.06 seconds with 30 queries by YEKTAWEB 3708